This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- Scotteiπ 06:40, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Article lacks sufficient context as to be comprehensible. The facts recited therein seem a bit questionable to me, too. Kelly Martin 18:23, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
Delete as fancruft. Martg76 18:42, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Whatahell? Delete as incomprehensible fancruft. Geogre 03:41, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, cruft. Megan1967 04:45, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable. Teklund 11:34, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.