Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1717 East Ninth Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 10:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1717 East Ninth Building

This is yet another skyscraper up for deletion in Cleveland, but unlike 55 Public Square, which passed, this one is clearly un-notable. BarryBonds100 22:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Apperently it was one of the first high-rises in Cleveland. I'm not completely sure if that makes it notable, but for now my stance is a weak keep. Lorty 23:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Borderline of notability. I'm also against transforming a blue link into a red link on List of tallest buildings in Cleveland.--Húsönd 04:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Since Cleveland is a big city, its buildings should have an artical, or at least put in Cleveland's artical. Rhino131 6:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unsourced; the reference claimed in the article is more like spam than a reference, especially because the partial public data on the building are about four clicks away from the link provided. GRBerry 21:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I fixed the reference to meet the actual article, so keep. Lorty 21:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all large buildings and structures in major urban centres. --Centauri 14:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep only due to the fact that it was one of the first high risers in Clevland. Pic would be nice however.--†ĥε þяíћɔЄ öf ɒĥɑямä^{Talk to Me} 22:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.