Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Droenz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 14:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 16 Droenz

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}
16 Droenz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability; does not meet WP:BAND requirements.  REDVERS ↔ SЯEVDEЯ  11:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

played on rock radio locally. Alienbabyboy 12:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)alienbabyboy

hey, blue cool deleted my comment earlier so i deleted this. don't delete mine if you want to be fair.Alienbabyboy 12:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - I originally PROD'd this article. Currently no evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC guideline. JRHorse 15:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Doczilla 17:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • don't delete talked to him and said he may find more sources. Scepterhelder 01:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Note: user has not edited any other page except for this one, as confirmed here Acalamari 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • don't delete pretty sure they can meet the standards. just not enough info at the moment205.241.9.3 01:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 19:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete 202.128.25.222 21:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)— 202.128.25.222 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete this article on grounds of zero notabilty as per WP:Music. If they were a properly signed band, I'm pretty sure someone, somewhere in their management would have avoided the inevitable lawsuit by telling them that the name T-Rex is already copyrighted! I'm surprised renowned critic Beanie didn't spot this. A1octopus 15:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Rodney Roque, a musician of this band has been reposted despite being previously CSD'd (following an AfD) so I've CSD-G4 tagged it. A1octopus 16:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment T-Rex is a given nickname. Therefore, lawsuit can't be filed against the individual. Alienbabyboy 08:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment It would be if he used that name commercially in the music business. If you're saying the band hasn't reached this stage yet then you're arguing for the deletion of your own article. A1octopus 09:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment the band just saw this page a few minutes ago and they want it to be deleted. their reasons were that they don't feel like they deserve this acknowledgement and even if they did deserve it, they wouldn't want this because they didn't put together this band to be famous. they just wanted to send out good message... so you win. Alienbabyboy 11:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.