Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Daily Pro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 12 Daily Pro

Spam, but I'm AFD'ing instead of speedying in case anyone can rescue this. 23skidoo 04:13, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete (speedy) spamvertising of the most shameless kind. Chris the speller 04:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (speedy) as above.--Bkwillwm 18:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete oh yeah, spam for sure.--MONGO 02:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete copy-pasted advert. Not a speedy, we don't appear to have a category for these (yet). Stifle 00:05, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete could possibly become a worthwile article but as written it is shameless advertising and the topic doesn't seem too notable. If someone rewrites it seriously, i'll probably change my vote. Cool3 00:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete (speedy deletion criterion G4). howcheng {chat} 18:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 12 Daily Pro

It's back, blatant marketing spam Wyss 17:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy please... Wyss 17:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Do you guys realize there is another page at 12DailyPro? Merge it first, then consider deleting the entire thing. Meandmyself 17:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Not anymore there isn't. howcheng {chat} 18:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.