Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Angry Men (play)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{subst:Afd top}} {{subst:#if: | {{subst:#switch: {{{1}}} | d = delete. | k = keep. | nc = no consensus to delete, default to keep. | m = merge. | r = redirect. | {{{1}}} }}}} {{subst:#if: | {{{2}}} }} Keep (nomination withdrawn) Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 19:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 12 Angry Men (play)

Pointless article, everything is already stated in 12 Angry Men. Delete. Fangz the Wolf 16:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep Notable, since it came before the film. Doc Strange 17:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The fact that a movie is based on it doesn't make it less notable... was famous before the movie and continues to be performed as/read as literature as a play. Pinball22 17:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Close. The article is in PROD, it should not be here in AfD. Nonetheless, keep. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• keep don't be silly. Artw 18:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Extremely notable play. The presence of an article about one of the film adaptations is irrelevant. However, I do reccomend changing the film article title to 12 Angry Men (film) and making the play the main and initial article on this subject. 23skidoo 18:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• comment I realize and understand the importance of this play, but this article doesn't really touch it. It touches the 1997 adaption film more than anything. It should be expanded or deleted. Fangz the Wolf 18:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

It should be expanded Get typing then. Lugnuts 18:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

CLOSE THIS Fangz the Wolf 18:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy keep As above Maelwys 19:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.