Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11th and 7th millennium BC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete; original research.   jj137 ^♠ 03:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 11th and 7th millennium BC

11th and 7th millennium BC (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested Prod - prod was removed by article's author without comment or explanation. This is an original research paper, and as such, should be deleted. Dawn bard (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete apparently original research, even recognizing it as the author's hypothesis. Rigadoun (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• speedy delete - not even close to being an encyclopedia article. Addhoc (talk) 19:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Entirely original research, though it's possible that some encyclopedic contribution on the subject could be made. But not with this article, not in this manner, nor with this original research. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 20:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't a speedy candidate, but it is pretty clearly original research. Zetawoof_(ζ) 22:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR. —Angr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 22:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Definitely Original research. Happy Holidays!! Malinaccier (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete OR, per above. Chris! _ct 02:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.