The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. RobertT | @ | C 21:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable and advertisement. Google search returns no pertinent hits except for the blog-esque site that the article links to. -D. Wu 20:48, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. - Dalbury(Talk) 03:06, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. mdd4696 04:49, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Strong delete per nom, not worth a witticism. Avalon 22:38, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Rogerd 05:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.