Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10061092961

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – Rich Farmbrough 10:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 10061092961

The subject is not notable there are infinte number of integers having to prime factors abakharev 13:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Delete, I'm getting tired from voting to delete non notable numbers.Rhetoricalwater 14:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. NNN (non-notable number). This one seems even more non-notable than most. Plus, per WP naming convention, years, not numbers, have all numeric titles, as 2005, 1945, 476 and 3. This article should be about the year AD 10061092961. Redirect to 10061093rd century!? --A D Monroe III 15:36, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Barely notable. Title makes it look like the article is about a year. --Optichan 17:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's pages like this that need to be speedy deleted. We really don't need to even have a vote on this, do we? Masterhatch 18:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Very few numbers deserve articles (e, pi, the golden ration, etc.). This is not one of them. I agree, that some guideline should be put in place to speedy delete such articles. Cool3 03:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as above. Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as NNN per AD Monroe. Xoloz 12:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Totally uninteresting number. Title makes it look like a year. Boot the wretched thing. Reyk 02:59, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Real number, NPOV and verifyable.
• Delete this one really is nn as far as we know now. Rich Farmbrough 10:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

  In fact I cant help wondering if it was a case of WP:POINT. Rich Farmbrough

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.