Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1½-hit wonder

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:32, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 1½-hit wonder

This looks redundant to one-hit wonder. With a one-hit wonder, an artist has exactly 1 hit in the top 40 of the Billboard Hot 100 and doesn't take into consideration if the artist had any other releases. Every artist listed as a 1½-hit wonder matches this criteria. I've never heard of a band being notable for having single(s) peaking at 41-100 on the Billboard Hot 100. It also sounds like a fake word. Big Ben Clock 03:23, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) I've withdrawn my nomination. The people on IRC convinced me on the actual use of this term. Big Ben Clock 03:36, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Comment did they direct you to a source? I'd like to see it myself. Personally I don't trust anything said by anyone on IRC. Megan1967 13:20, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment there's a category an article for Zero-hit wonder too. —Wahoofive | Talk 17:18, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Considering it was created on April Fools Day, and it has no evidence of being a real term, nor has any been posted since, I think it's a prank. (Unless "the people on IRC" would like to produce actual sources. Lots of things are said on IRC, not all of them reliable.) Jonathunder 05:22, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
• Comment I think this article (and zero-hit) points out the fact that One-hit wonder criterion is quite poor. I mean, Moby is a one-hit wonder? Las Ketchup isn't? Something's very wrong here. Grue 06:54, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• According to One-hit wonder, a "hit" means the song charted in the top 40. A "two-hit wonder" had two songs in the top 40. Yet according to this article, a 1½-hit wonder has two hits but only one of them are in the top 40. Unless I'm missing something, that means the second song was not a "hit". That and some other things on the page make me seriously suspect that this is a prank. Delete unless authoritatively sourced. By the way, the VfD header was never added to the article. Rossami (talk) 22:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.