Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0x29A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 22:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 0x29A

WP:SOFTWARE:(na) Not significant in terms of language development; no implementation (AFAIK); and its source is a single obscure web page that describes it informally. Quamaretto 17:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Programming languages do not fall under WP:SOFTWARE. No implementation is available. [1] "0x29a" "programming language" -wikipedia -encyclopedia returns 17 unqiue hits. —Ruud 22:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, or blank and redirect to 666 (disambiguation) for a good time. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SOFTWARE--Isotope23 18:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-natable esoteric programming language. —Ruud 22:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but provide option to link site and have basic summary in another page since it seems to exist. — Dzonatas 22:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The niche dysfunctional programming is already well covered by all currently used languages :) Pavel Vozenilek 23:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- Chris 73 | Talk 00:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like a vanity page, and probably never could be more than a stub. bmills 03:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unimplemented. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 03:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete See reason above Nigelthefish 13:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.