Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0 for 4 Curse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  RasputinAXP  c 20:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 0 for 4 Curse

131 Google hits, nearly all of which are mirrors or links on other WP pages. No sources. The article doesn't even make clear what the curse is. djrobgordon 03:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - If it requires that much explanation, it's not a very good curse. - Richfife 04:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Someone has obviously made up a whole lot of articles to explain away any possible curse, most of which fail both WP:NOR and are also complete nonsense. BoojiBoy 04:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I tagged it with {{OriginalResearch}} back on 16 January 2006. [1] Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:59, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. These curse pages are cursed today.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. Ted 14:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, OR, non-verified, sportscruft, not of much interest outside the USA (yes, such places do exist!) JIP | Talk 17:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all curse...cruft? - Kookykman|(t)e 21:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. - Richardcavell 02:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NOR Retropunk 05:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.