Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0 (Star Trek)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Q Continuum#Known members of the Q Continuum. Fabrictramp (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 0 (Star Trek)

0 (Star Trek) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Tis belongs on Memory Alpha. Unsourced article about a character in the Star Trek books (but not TV or film franchise) written in-universe and not cleaned up since tagging in January. Guy (Help!) 09:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

• Merge to Q Continuum#Known members of the Q Continuum Colonel Warden (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Q Continuum#Known members of the Q Continuum; a better place for this information until it can be expanded enough to warrant its own article. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 18:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into Q Continuum#Known members of the Q Continuum *or* List of Star Trek characters: A-F (which has been a suggested merge target since January). If the character is from a book, the book is the source. --Pixelface (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect, per nom. FCYTravis (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete (first choice) or Merge (second choice) to Star Trek The Q Continuum. This character is non-canon and should only be discussed in relation to the single series of books in which he appears, rather than the other lists, which are (mostly) canon. Horologium (talk) 02:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable, no assertion of notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge → a new subsection of Q Continuum#Known members of the Q Continuum entitled 'Non-canon' or the like. I do agree that mixing canon and non-canon in the same list is not desirable. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Much of the information in this article already exists at my suggested merge target of Star Trek The Q Continuum. Horologium (talk) 17:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.