Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.hack/SIGN

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY REDIRECTED. — JIP | Talk 05:43, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] .hack/SIGN

Grammar is abysmal, organization is abysmal, topic already exists under the CORRECT title (.hack//SIGN), and the information given is purely redundant when compared with the actual topic. Merge would be pointless and a waste of time. - Zenithan 01:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

• Dude, just Redirect to .hack//SIGN. There's no point in deleting the page outright. Nifboy 01:12, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect For future reference, you should feel to redirect pages like this to the correct entry. There is no harm in having a redirect, and people might search for the incorrect "spelling". In general, its not necessary to bring this here. Be bold! --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:19, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, it does not seem to be useful for a merge, and one slash could very well be a typo. -- ReyBrujo 01:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I've redirected. Will some admin please be bold and do a speedy close on this? — Phil Welch 01:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.