Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-kai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 22:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] -kai

-kai (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. No assertion of notability. No indication the topic is substantial enough for an encyclopedia article. Vassyana 01:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete WP isn't a dictionary, no notability established, no sources. WP isn't a translator either. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP is not a dictionary; may belong in Wiktionary, but even that is questionable. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 06:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

&Delete per above Aminullah 12:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Wow, I'm surprised I didn't find this WP:NOT violation :) ~ Magnus animum ∵ ∫ φ γ 21:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above. Lemonflash(t)/(c) 23:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tried to get rid of extraneous stuff in the article, but as I noted in my edit summaries, I'm not sure there's anything useful here. On the other hand, are any of the articles in Category:Suffixes really useful? I'm not trying to make a WP:WAX argument... I'm just wondering if things like -kinesis should be considered for deletion as well. Dekimasuよ! 06:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment — I've verified kai (改?) to be a shorthand for kaizo (改造?), by browsing through the related Japanese Wikipedia articles. However, I don't find any of this information to be notable in the English Wikipedia. A wiktionary link to kai will probably suffice, from all currently linked articles.--Endroit 17:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. John Smith's 17:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.