Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-chezia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE--Doc (?) 23:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] -chezia

Suffix dictdef without encyclopedic potential. Should be transwikied before deletion, unless someone can say for sure that it's incorrect. It's hard to find attestations for word fragments, so I can't confirm it myself. —Cryptic (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Don't bother transwiking. Wiktionary is not a garbage dump. Loss of one sentence is hardly, a great loss. We shouldn't fill up a dictinary with every supposed word (or suffix) that can't be proven to be non-existent. I don't object to somebody looking into to its existent further, if they wish, but the default assumption should be that nothing needs to be done with this one-line article. --rob 11:11, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• I concur; delete, do not transwiki unless somebody manages to verify this information. - Mike Rosoft 13:29, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - no OED entry Chick Bowen 20:57, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, dicdef. No need to transwiki imho. Shauri 20:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.