Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 17:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] -19

Article is essentially a disambiguation page about a non-notable number. It goes without saying that keeping this article sets a dangerous precident! Along those lines, what's up with Category:Negative numbers? - squibix 01:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• delete, unless there is something interesting to say about -19. Kappa 01:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Better add Category:Negative numbers to the debate also. --kingboyk 02:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Minus one number article. Will change vote to "Keep" if a verifiable test shows -19 to be the IQ of George W. Bush. Apologies for WP:NPA violation. Barno 02:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

It's also the number of men who recall doing drill with Bush in the Texas Air National Guard in 1972. PrimeFan 20:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete -40 (number) it ain't. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wiki spam? --BakugekiNZ 04:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - No content --Lightdarkness 04:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I've also placed the category on CFD, -- Egil 06:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not sure about the category, though. --James S. 07:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 100% agree with nom. Dangerous precident. The Deviant 16:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Or maybe merge with 19? ^KILO-_LIMA 17:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn Incognito 20:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, -19 means minus nineteen? Are you sure about that? And what about a debt of 19 pounds sterling? Basically, what I want to say is NN. GoldenTie 20:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -19 might be a discriminant for Heegner numbers, but other than that I doubt there's anything else interesting to say about this number. This article is therefore not justified by WP:NUM. PrimeFan 20:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --NaconKantari 21:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even though its the exact part of the space shuttle countdown when most astronauts' balls shrink to the size of hazelnuts. --Deiz 22:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There is nothing in this article that makes it any more notable than any other negative integer. JIP | Talk 15:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Revolución (talk) 00:51, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.