Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/“ 闇に惑いし哀れな影よ・・・ 人を傷つけ貶めて、罪に溺れし業の魂 ・・・ いっぺん、死んで見る?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted as WP:CSD#A1 (short article / no context). —dgiestc 22:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] “ 闇に惑いし哀れな影よ・・・ 人を傷つけ貶めて、罪に溺れし業の魂 ・・・ いっぺん、死んで見る?
This is a nice story, but I don't think Wikipedia is about collecting random stories without background information. -- Prince Kassad 19:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete for several reasons: The title is not in English, it seems to be either non-notable and/or completely made up, and it has no sources. KJS77 19:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- This appears to be the description of an anime show, Jigoku Shōjo. Redirect to that title. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as nonsense. There is virtually no way someone on the English Wikipedia will ever get to this article except by the Random button, so a redirect is not warranted. DarkAudit 20:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Now that you mention it, I notice most of the article is copied from the Story caption of Jigoku Shōjo. -- Prince Kassad 20:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete per KJS Blueboy96 20:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as having no context. I have no idea what they're talking about, and I don't even know what the title of the article says. --Haemo 21:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. There may be a topic here, but it is not being communicated. --EMS | Talk 21:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Why is this even up for debate? I would've just used the {{speedy}} tag. --Kimontalk 22:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Merge to Jigoku Shōjo132.205.44.134 22:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)- Speedy delete duplicates material at Jigoku Shojo. 132.205.44.134 22:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.