Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/گولبوليوم

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted - nonsense - Note that there is no criterion for speedying for not being in english, unless the article is at that language's WP. On the other hand nonsense, coyvio, etc, criteria apply regardless of language. - Nabla 17:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] گولبوليوم

گولبوليوم (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nonsense Gfzh 14:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now, give it a little more time for the translation request. I have no clue what it says so I cannot speak on the value of this article itself, but it should be given the benefit of the doubt. Once the translation request is expired, if no one has fixed it, then it can be deleted. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, article is already under a time-limited translation request. This nomination is premature. --Dhartung | Talk 15:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Terribly Arabic. Delete per nom. Bigtop 16:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• USERFY somewhere and Delete - I do not think foreign language articles should be allowed to stay "up" while translation requests are being processed. Corpx 18:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete How can we possibly know that it's not libelous until someone who knows Arabic reviews it? It could be anything, including gibberish. Isn't there some kind of speedy-delete rule about non-English postings? Noroton 20:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

الأحماض التي يمكن ربطها معاً بمختلف الإرتباطات لتكوين سلسل بروتينية. مكونات 'لسلسلة حماض الامينية والتتابع الذي تترتب فيه تلك الاحماض على طوللسلسلة يحدد كيفية التفاف السلسلة في هيئة ثلاثية الابعاد وربما ترتبط بسلاسل أخرى.Mandsford 22:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Noroton. I don't know whether this is Arabic, Farsi, or something else, but neither the Arabic nor Farsi Wikipedia has any article by this name. Furthermore, the article is only one sentence long, so if it gets deleted we won't lose much. I disagree with the idea that a foreign language article placed on the English Wikipedia is entitled to remain for 14 days before being deleted, while an English-language article can be speedied in minutes, or go to WP:PROD or WP:AFD and be deleted within 5 days. Foreign language articles should be deleteable speedily or within 5 days too. --Metropolitan90 03:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Translation (?) Persian. Provisional and very hesitant translation: "Gulbulium is one of the rarest elements which exists in the galaxy. It was first discovered by Gijoolzade in the month of Aban in the (solar) year 1304". News to me. Speedy delete as nonsense (Iranians make up things in school one day too). --Folantin 07:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Harlowraman 13:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete; unverifiable. — The Storm Surfer 21:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be nonsense. --UsaSatsui 04:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete based on Folatin's translation, speedily if possible. Apparently it can't be speedied because it is not in English...? If so, that policy looks like an invitation to vandals to prevent speedies by use of unicode gibberish. Leibniz 12:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.