Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ülker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ülker

Ülker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. No assertion of notability. Vegaswikian 03:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep A google search demonstrates substantial independent coverage. It is a large multinational corporation. The article needs to be expanded upon to reflect this, so I will put a stub. --Mkativerata 03:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • The article needs to make the assertion and not Goggle. Vegaswikian 03:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment So we amend the article, not delete it, where the notability is so obvious. --Mkativerata 03:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep After reviewing the company web page and several articles in independent media I can see that this company is one of the larger if not largest independent consumer food manufacturing multi-nationals in the Middle East. I agree with Mkativerata that the article is currently only stub class, and the company is worthy of notice. The article should be kept and then expanded with the pertinent facts and information. - Jeremy (Jerem43 17:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC))

• Keep. Major Turkish company.  --Lambiam 23:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep . Even we in Hungary have Ülker products on the shelves. One of the major Turkish food companies. --Teemeah Gül Bahçesi 07:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Major Turkish company, even a natural monopoly in its sector. Highly internationally active. Sponsor of Turkish sports giants. See this as well, the European Kettle award winner, $3 billion sales in 2006 ... Needs expansion. Deniz^T_C 19:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - it is a major corporation but the article does need work.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 21:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The company looks notable and the article is new. Let's give a chance for the authors to improve the article and assert notability. Pocopocopocopoco 03:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a major corporation. —Insanely Beautiful 07:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I have xpanded a bit and added references. --Teemeah Gül Bahçesi 11:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.