Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(Anesthesia) Pulling Teeth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect. Consensus seems to be that each song is notable, but only in the context of the album. Ta bu shi da yu 13:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] (Anesthesia) Pulling Teeth

(Anesthesia) Pulling Teeth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Previously prod'ed, with that template being removed and the final bracketed text in the article ("This article is fine, and decently informative") added. This is an album track, albeit one from a notable album by a notable band. That doesn't mean that an article is necessary, though, and I don't see any third-party reliable sources discussing it. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 03:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete A bass solo is notable? MarkBul 04:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Kill Em All. Steve CarlsonTalk 07:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless sources are provided demonstrating the notability of the subject. J Milburn 18:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to album unless notability is shown, which is a standard practice for such a case and something that can also be implemented directly (e.g. instead of a prod). --Tikiwont 15:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

MergeAdd to the Kill 'Em All Page and just add a few notes on the song beneath, perhaps for every song on the page.George bennett 16:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep as I cant see any point to tag this article with AfD rather it surprised me. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 09:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Given that the song was not released as a single and has no reliable, independent non-trivial mentions establishing its notability in spite of that fact, are you still surprised? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Convinced but still I prefer a merger than go for a deletion. So, here goes my vote, Merge with an appropriate standard article. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 19:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I randomly stumbled upon this article, but it seems that almost every song on Kill 'em All has an article, and this one looks no less notable than the others. We have some articles about Beatles b-sides that were never released, so the notability plank is set quite low. You can't find the sources because you can't google it on the internets? Well, consider that this was released in 1983. Certainly there are some reviews in some old magazines that discuss or mention this song.  Grue  19:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
    • The fact that we have articles on Beatles B-Sides is neither here nor there. It could just as easily mean that nobody's got around to AfD-ing them, or indeed that they are substantially better-sourced than this. I don't have ready access to any offline copies of these magazines, and since the AfD has been listed for several days without anyone else providing them, I'm starting to think it's a forlorn hope. Do you know of any such reviews? BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Merge. Though it hardly stands a chance as a stand-alone article, it still is mighty informative and useful to anybody who's interested in Hard Rock or whatever. A merge into Kill Em All is much better solution than an outright delete. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with the album. — Moe ε 00:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.