Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Life Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. нмŵוτнτ 23:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 'Life Circle

'Life Circle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable student film from student film makers which fails notability criteria NAHID 08:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as per nom SGGH ^speak! 00:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - I have found several references as shown here [1] that could make a case for notability. However, by my standards, not quite there yet. If more secondary sources and a more noteworthy source can be provided, you could change my opinion very easily. Shoessss |  Chat  00:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 02:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. per this and this. Not sure, however, if that's considered substantial coverage per WP:BIO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete A student film would have to be really really really special to have an article. This isn't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. per above Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 21:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - this is part of a determined campaign of self-promotion by the director Malaka Dewapriya under his usernames Malakadew (talk · contribs), Srilanka short film (talk · contribs) and Srilankan short film (talk · contribs), all now blocked. JohnCD (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.