Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-12-10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All article submissions on this archive page have been mass moderated, and none of the remaining submissions are suitable for articles on Wikipedia. The page has been mass moderated and can safely be marked as completed.

Please now follow the link back to Wikipedia:Articles for creation.

Submitters: Please do not remove other submissions from this page. This page is a collection of many people's submissions.
Reviewers: Please check yesterday's submissions as well as looking at today's, and also check the backlog of unreviewed articles from all prior days.

Contents





[edit] Erwin S. Strauss



[edit] JimberJanmers





















[edit] League of Villains






[edit] Stacy's Music Row Report



[edit] Black Boy Inn













[edit] Lloyd O'Neill (Cambridge United Footballer)

[edit] Nice 'n' Ripe Records

[edit] Airos Image Gallery





  • Actually, I believe the criticism about my submission yesterday was that I had not provided sufficient information about the author. If you would care to take a closer look, you will see that I have, indeed, addressed that issues. Furthermore, you should also notice that the article was actually rejected earlier this evening.

I also notice that you have rejected the article below: Falling (novel) which I also submitted yesterday. The partticular author in this case HAS got a page on Wikipedia, together with a substantial bibliography of her worls, so your rejection seems a little bizarre.

I am starting to wonder whether your decision may have been influenced by this previous reject. Consequently, I would like another editor to review them. 217.43.199.206 23:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The problem is that unless you clearly explain WHY the subject meets Wikipedias article guidelines, we can't easily tell whether to include it or not. For books, you need to explain why both the author and the book are significant. 99% of book article submissions are just 'The author is called this...Here is the plot' - and that's simply not enough either to justify the existance of the article - nor to get it started. Wikipedia isn't here to store plot synopsis for all of the hundreds of millions of books that are in print - they have to be NOTABLE. Please read the associated WP: guidelines. Furthermore, you cannot expect the reviewers here to be knowledgeable about ever single author and book title - that is why it is ESSENTIAL that you spell out why the author is significant - and why the book is important enough to justify an article. I did not feel you had adequately done that - so (as with most book submissions - sadly) - the previous reviewer asked for you to expand on those areas - and you did not...so I simply repeated their rejection. SteveBaker 00:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Joshua Tierney (August 8th, 1984-August 8th, 2026)

[edit] New World Rock