Wikipedia:Article assessment/Natural disasters/Krakatoa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Assessment of an article under the topic Natural disasters.
Article: Krakatoa
Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.
[edit] Review by violet/riga (t)
- Coverage and factuality: 6
- Covers things well but is not properly referenced
- Writing style: 9
- Well written except for a few small areas
- Structure: 7
- Tiny "Before 1883" section and oddly placed "Earlier eruptions" (merge the two?) - some reordering needed
- Aesthetics: 8
- Some nice images and generally well done, but could do with at least one more image (an overhead map comparison?)
- Overall: 7
Badly needs references and could do with restructuring. violet/riga 23:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Review by MacGyverMagic
- Coverage and factuality: 8
-
- Covers things nicely, but contains a contradiction as to whether the eruption was heard or felt in Australia (difference between lead and section of article). Has one listed ref at bottom, a few in text, needs more, but better than some.
- Writing style: 9
-
- A few odd phrases (as far distant as), and a few jargon words not explained. Spelling, grammar okay. Keeps interest.
- Structure: 9
-
- Proper table in well-sized lead. Good use of infobox, images and sectioning. Could do with slightly more images.
- Aesthetics: 9
-
- Nice images and table style and generally attractive.
- Overall: 9
[edit] Review by [name]
- Coverage and factuality:
- Writing style:
- Structure:
- Aesthetics:
- Overall:
