User talk:Artene50
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes Sarajevo does indeed and member of Bosnia and Herzegovina presidency from Sarajevo made it clear that Bosnia will not recognise Kosovo. --Avala (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Deletion of articles
- AFD: {{subst:afd1}}
* {{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | text=Reason for deletion}}--~~~~
- {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/topicname}} (add to top of list)
If you already know the rest of the deletion process, go ahead and place the articles for deletion if you so wish. To notify the author, just place {{subst:adw|NAMEOFPAGE}} ~~~~ on their talk page, replacing NAMEOFPAGE with the page's name. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- If you think it's not controversial, try a prod instead. The template for that is {{subst:prod|reason why you think the article should be deleted}}, and {{subst:prodwarning|Template:Prod}} ~~~~ for warning the user. Note, however, that someone might remove the prod; if so, then you can take it to AfD normally. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- You had [brackets] around the article name [like this]. I removed the brackets for you, so now you can make the discussion page (click "preloaded debate" on the template). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- You don't have to call me sir. Ten Pound Hammer, TPH, Hammer, or even Bobby work just fine. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- If you plan to become regularly involved in Articles for Deletion, I would recommend installing Twinkle. It automates the entire AfD process; all you have to do is type in a rationale and click a button. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] deletions
As for me, it seems Sumerophile, Adil and you are the same person. But right now I dont care about it. Just remember to read the Wiki rules before the deletion of the sourced info to be successful. Andranikpasha (talk) 11:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't know Sumerophile. He is certainly not me. Much of the 'sourced' info on Urartu doesn't even mention Urartu. The info. given in the article--that the last 3 or 4 kings of Urartu were really Armenian or that Urartu was a strong power even in its final years--is either inaccurate, false (since Urartu was close to collapse in its final years) or based on suppositions/what ifs. Perhaps the final Urartu king, Rusa IV, had ties to Armenians but that is all one can conclude. I noted specifically on the Redgate url that it does not deal with Urartu. I offered 2 dates for the end of Uratu--590 or 585 BC and you deleted them both. Why is that--because one is from a Turkish website? That violates NPOV or using sources from only one side and ignoring the other. What you are offering is a POV which brings into question the reliability of Wikipedia's information. (like Ararat Arev) Encyclopedia Brittanica would never consider such 'evidence' on Urartu in the first place. It is best to stick to the facts. Artene50 (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply! You added at Hayasa-Azzi: "However, non-Armenian scholars doubt this connection since the arrival of the Armenians can only be securely dated to the 6th century BC with the Orontid kings in the Armenian highlands." But how this is connected with the ethnogenesis of Armenians? I dont know even one source which says Armenians have no genetical relations to Hayas's just because the arrival of the Armenians can be dated to the 6th century BC. If Hayas's participated to the ethnogenesis of Armenians (I think, its an commonly accepted fact, no any historian denies such a connection), it never means they (the Hayasa people) were already formed Armenians. So lets delete the cited sentence as an irrelevant one. Andranikpasha (talk) 09:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
I'm sorry--what is it you would like to know? Qworty (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- In terms of PrivacyView, I'm afraid the notability of software companies is not one of my areas of expertise. The sourcing looks like it might be solid, but I really have no idea how the article compares/contrasts with articles about software companies that are undeniably notable. Qworty (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Steve Allday
I added some references to Steve Allday. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Steve Allday. --Eastmain (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Copyvios
I only keep track of a few articles at a time. If you want to tag something as a copyvio, you can tag it for speedy deletion with {{db-copyvio|url=(the website it was copied from)}} only if it was copied from another website. There's really no specific "tag" for general AfDs though. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's a good idea to inform someone if you're going to AfD a page they created. If you plan to be involved in AfD, you might want to go into your preferences and install Twinkle. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New Articles
There is a very easy way to monitor new articles. My nomination today was an article I stumbled upon, but I've done some new pages patrolling before. It's simple. On the tool bar at the left of the screen you'll see the "Recent Pages" button. Click that. At the top of that page, in the second line there is an option for clicking New Pages (Right after Utilities and RC Patrol). AniMate 10:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)