Talk:Artemis Eternal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Future
This article has been rated as Future-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Reference

I added a reference if that helps in keeping this article from being deleted. --Alreajk (talk)

Go ahead and delete it. I've copied it to my user namespace (Artemis Eternal) until it becomes notable enough. --Alreajk (talk) 22:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm more interested in the unique way this film is being made than in the actual film at this point. I think it might warrent an article if if focused more on the interactive and collectivist methods that are going into the film's production.Dodavehu (talk) 18:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm more interested in the idea behind the movie as opposed to the actual movie itself as well, but I don't think that this article would be saved from deletion if those things were noted and added. Instead, I think a more appropriate article would be about Jessica Stover. I'm saving this article anyway under my user page, and articles are easy to make in Wikipedia anyway. Losing this article as it is wouldn't be so horrible. --Alreajk (talk) 22:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Reference

http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=840602&sourceType=1 This give the film more notability, as it even mentions when fimling will start. I fear it;s not enough to keep this article alive, but its progress. --Alreajk (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Additional News Coverage

Thanks for adding these links, however, I think these should by put into the reference section instead. --24.189.67.12 (talk) (Alreajk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)