Talk:Art Malik
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
 This article is part of WikiProject James Bond, an attempt to improve content and create better coordination between articles related to the James Bond 007 genre of books, films, characters and related articles. You can help in improvement by editing Art Malik or related pages. |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
The world premiere of Indian Ink was in 1995. Malik also played the role in 1999. Did he really revive the play in 2004, or is the year wrong in this sentence? Dybryd 21:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Why is the interview for the Holby City website characterised (twice) as "disobliging"? It is not exactly discursive, but this was clearly not an interview as such but a web chat, with inane questions from TV viewers, not journalists, which he answered. Given the level of the questions the answers seem reasonable enough. I don't think the "interview" deserves to be described as "disobliging", especially as he certainly "plugged" Holby City enough! Rachel Pearce 11:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Religious stance: Sunni Islam
Why is this important? Religion is personal and for the job as actor not important. 84.62.163.231 22:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Shah LD.jpg
Image:Shah LD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
