Talk:Aroj Ali Matubbar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
Aroj Ali Matubbar is part of WikiProject Bangladesh, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bangladesh and Bangladesh-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not subsitute this template.
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
| Collaborations: | Sundarbans & Cox's Bazar |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. | ||
[edit] Discussing deletion, July 2007
Aroj Ali Matubbar is a famous Bangladeshi writer and religious philosopher who has written many books. I don't see why he should be considered an insignificant person. He has many readers in Bangladesh. Many articles can be found about him in the google search engine.
Aroj Ali's writings have been banned in Bangladesh in the past for speaking out against religious doctrines. You should let me finish writing the article, and then decide on its significance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mehzabin ahmed (talk • contribs) 23:20, 26 July 2007 GMT.
- The "speedy deletion" template was put up not because somebody was claiming Matubbar was unimportant, but because the article (as it was at the time) didn't provide any information on its importance. The rest of us have no way of really knowing what you plan to add to the article. It stands, or falls, on what's in the article at the time and the sources it points to.
- I've taken out the "speedy deletion" template on this because by now the article has enough information to cover the original concern. -- Why Not A Duck 23:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I thought it was safe for editing as I used a stub tag. Anyways, it was lacking references at first, but I added references to it now.Mehzabin ahmed 03:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Mehzabin Ahmed
