User talk:Arnie Gov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Ham
Ham does have the connotation of 'Black', in a skintone sense. The meaning has been moderated for PC reasons in most sources. In many lexicons the term 'sunburnt' is used, but the real meaning here is 'black' as in black skin. Sorry if this irritates your racism sensibilities, but thats what the word means.
[1] < did you follow this link?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.72.49 (talk) 12:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Just FYI
Mormons are christians: the definition of christian is a follower of christ. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mbatman72 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:,pl--ok-okm.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:,pl--ok-okm.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What are you up to?
Hi Arnie: Could you please explain these edits: [2] [3] ? (at the Sephardi Jews article.) This may be considered Wikipedia:Vandalism and you are advised not to insert such frivolous photos into main articles. Feel free to discuss any questions you may have that connect with Judaism in any way at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Thank you. IZAK 09:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 15:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:01mosaic3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:01mosaic3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01mosaic3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)