User talk:Armyguy11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


overlooking this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GhIcnRNwUg


Welcome!

Hello, Armyguy11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

So...once again I hope that your stay with us at Wikipedia is completely enjoyable. If you need any help, I'm here. GeneralIroh (Leave a message after the beep if you gotta problem.) 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

P.S. If you want to make a cool userpage...you might wanna look at this.


The addition of the inadequate Parsley Massacre infobox in every which article you feel like adding it is lessening the quality of the articles involved. This has been talked about in the discussion page for Parsley Massacre and the very user who made the infobox has (at your request) chimed in with the opinion that the infobox removed. It's beginning to border on vandalism, but I won't bother with it, or you, any more. Get over it, man. EYDrevista (talk) 12:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Seriously, get over it. No one else wants it there, and on Wikipedia things work by consensus. If you keep adding it you are going to get blocked. Plasynins (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Look on the talk page. Even the person who created it says it could be removed. Several people have removed it and given reasons, you are the only one who has put it back. One against many is consensus. Plasynins (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Also stop messing up the links. I can't tell if you are a vandal or not.
Please read the discussion on the talk page and the comments by Rosicrucian. This user explains why the infobox is not appropriate. I agree, and another user agrees it should be removed. If you disagree, explain why there. If you revert more I will report you for violating WP:3RR. Plasynins (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Threatening me won't work. You are giving no good reasons for your reversions, while mine are backed up by the comments of several users. Plasynins (talk) 22:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


Plasynins (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Y


This user has been offered adoption by an experienced editor
(If you wish adoption by another user click here)



Contents

[edit] Request for adoption

I see that were requesting adoption. Would you like me to adopt you? If you want to find out more about me, see my user page. You may also want to look at my description on the adopters' page. If you want me to adopt you, click the "edit" button to the right of the section heading of this message, and type below that you want me to adopt you. Please end your message with 4 tildes, which will sign your username and the time you replied. (~~~~) --TeckWiz ParlateContribs@ 21:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Haitian are discriminated in those plase not only DR

[edit] avfnx

Haitian are discriminated in those places not only DR AvFnx (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article nominated for speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on Angry black man syndrome, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is a very small article whose content would better be added as a single sentence to another article. This article is unlikely to be expanded, and not of benefit to a reader searching for information on the subject.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JERRY talk contribs 00:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, would you consider including the material to Racism in the United States instead of making it a stand-alone article? The sunject seems to be limited to the US, according to what you wrote, so it does not have a global perspective, and so it seems it would fit well in that article. Putting it there would also get it in front of readers interested in this subject better, instead of making it a small separate article. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 00:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Three-revert rule

Hi, I've closed off your recent two reports at WP:AN3 with no action. I am not sure you exactly understand the way the 3RR works. To be liable to be blocked, an editor must make more than three reverts during a 24-hour period. If there is more than 24 hours between the first and fourth reverts, then there is no violation (although you can still make a listing at WP:ANI or WP:RFPP if you wish). The two reports you made had three reverts in a 24 hour period (which is not a violation) and one other revert the previous day or week. This is not a breach of the three-revert rule. Please try to only report actual breaches in the future. Thanks - Stifle (talk) 10:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)