Talk:Armageddon (2007)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Armageddon (2007) article.

Article policies
WikiProject Professional wrestling Armageddon (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Citation for the dark match

Perhaps we've all seen this cited on wrestlezone.com, but its a news site, so we don't want it here. I found this

http://www.zimbio.com/Montel+Vontavious+Porter/articles/3/2007+WWE+Armageddon+Results

and this

http://www.wrestleview.com/news2006/1197878219.shtml - Even says Festus destroyed Morrison...perhaps made the pin, but let's not rush to conclusions.....

Here are some more, take a look and see what's up...

http://wwewrestlingvideos.blogspot.com/2007/12/rey-mysterio-vs-mvp-for-wwe-us-title-at.html http://www.thewrestlinggeek.com/blog1/category/wwe-ppv-results/armageddon/ http://www.wrestlingattitude.com/armageddon.php

I realize a lot of these sources are based around news and forum sites, but its all about the same.--Lord Dagon (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

If Wrestleview is an acceptable source in D2D (a FA) then I believe it's just fine here. You'll never find a WWE.com source for a dark match. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Actually, on a couple of occasions WWE has mentioned the dark match (like the lumberjack match at WrestleMania 23), although I recall them only doing this 2 or 3 times. TJ Spyke 21:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I took the liberty of citing it, if that's okay since you okayed the source and you are as I see it a huge contributor....--Lord Dagon (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I think that's fine, but others may disagree. And you overestimate my credentials. I don't do many important things, really. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Information and sources

Why can't people understand that you only write information when it is backed up by a source! 90% of this article isn't unsourced. And the "In Construction" tag is not enough actually, because it still doesn't give anyone the right to write some random information without backing it up with a citation. Lex T/C Guest Book 01:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pre-GA review

Well it's pretty obvious that at Report#Aftermath, references are needed. Do this and you're good to go! Limetolime talk to me look what I did! 21:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)