Talk:Aries (astrology)/archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
Comment 1
This reads like a horoscope, and needs to be cleaned up. icydid 01:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I just added the tag --michael180 21:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment 2
Aries are not prone to promiscuity, they are obsessive about honesty and therefore do not deceive unless something large has driven them to it.true.
- I went ahead and cleaned out most of the speculative content that belongs in a newspaper horoscope column. — TheKMantalk 21:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Notable persons
(see discussion below)
In case you're wondering what's happened to the Notable persons section, it has been deleted in favor of the page Category:Subjects of the Sign of Aries. If you want to add a notable person go there. --Carmelita 21:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- ARIES ROCKS. One reference is available on the article.If any reference needed then please add {{fact}}. NAHID 20:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- (I'm gonna cross-post this): there is absolutely no need to have a "notable persons" section. What about cuspers (people born between two signs), what would they be? If they went under both that'd take up more space. You can't list EVERY single person ever born under one sign. If you want to know what a famous person's zodiac sign or birthday is, just look up their separate article on Wikipedia. If they are famous, they should be on Wikipedia. So yeah, I'm taking out the notable persons section and I'm warning people not to readd it. 75.27.185.204 03:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- ARIES ROCKS. One reference is available on the article.If any reference needed then please add {{fact}}. NAHID 20:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment 3
The reference to 'the work of Doctor Acacandam dating from 1592' should presumably be to 'Doctor Arcandam' (Arcandam)? Kkjc5824 05:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
the zodiac sings normaly are used to predictions that are used whit willand won´t
what about what people under this sign are like? they usually have certain traits and i dont see that on these pages. should they be added?
71.167.94.59 17:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)