User talk:Argento3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Argento3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  HighInBC 13:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Sexism. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. HighInBC 13:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Roman helmet

I note int his article you list ypes A-I for example for helmets. Any possibility of a description or illustration for each? The name "type A" isn't very instructiv on its own. Cheers - PocklingtonDan 11:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I searched wikimedia commons to find images of roman helmets and the image that you see in the article is the only one that I found. You can find images for every type of helmet listed in the page if you search with google but I don't know if they can be included for fair use. Note that I'm not an expert, I added this page because I was modelling a roman helmet in 3d and I searched some photo references for a pair of days. I wrote all that I learned on helmets from this searching in that wikipedia page.--Argento3 21:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wiki-trees

Your recent addition of wiki-trees to the genealogy page has been removed. Wikipedia is not a repository of links, and while there are a number of small wiki-trees out there, none is significantly notable yet. Instead, I recommend you join the discussions on MetaWiki regarding the development of a wikimedia version of the program and how best to institute it. thank you. ThuranX 22:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Knights of the Round.png

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Knights of the Round.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Iris game logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Iris game logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Id Tech edits

The "id Tech (x)" engines should be referred to by their original names (and not the revisionist "id Tech" names) for historical purposes and for currently-released games (e.g., id Tech 3 --> Quake III Arena engine, id Tech 4 --> Doom 3 engine). However, for Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, "id Tech 4" can be used. Thoughts? Duo02 *dilly-dally shilly-shally** 04:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Thx for discussing this with me. I reported this discussion in the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games to form a consensus on the nomenclature.--Argento3 08:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)