Talk:Argument from marginal cases
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
 |
Argument from marginal cases is part of WikiProject Animal rights, a project to create and improve articles related to animal rights. If you would like to help, please consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
Two things to do for this page: Daniel Dombrowski's Babies and Beasts cites the person who originally articulated the Argument From Marginal Cases (at least in modern times in the West), and that should be noted here. Also, something should be mentioned in articles about animal liberation philosophy that links to this page. Thanks for creating this page. -Unnyn 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Low-importance Philosophy articles | Start-Class ethics articles | Low-importance ethics articles | Ethics task force articles | Start-Class logic articles | Low-importance logic articles | Logic task force articles | Start-Class Philosophy articles | Unassessed Animal rights articles | Unknown-importance Animal rights articles | WikiProject Animal rights articles
