Talk:Arfé

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub Class: This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)

Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.

Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

[edit] Deletion

  • Arfé - Tie this in with FRR. "Arfé is the creation of artworks by staining with coffee." Seems to be a Daniel C. Boyer special. Anthony DiPierro 04:53, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • There seems to be a level of dishonesty here. Francisco Rivera Rosa invented Arfé, or at least invented the name for it, to the best of my knowledge, and I have never made or attempted to make one. It is as nothing to do with me as anything could be. --Daniel C. Boyer 15:58, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
      • [1] Arfe: "A term coined by Francisco Rivera Rosa to describe his 'paintings' with coffee on paper (derived from art + café = Arfé) Daniel C. Boyer, Artist"
      • [2] You also are the one who created this stub. Anthony DiPierro 17:47, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
        • So what? I submitted information I knew about to one reference site, where it was presumably confirmed and included; I started an article on the same information I knew about in Wikipedia. I don't understand what your point is. --Daniel C. Boyer 19:54, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
          • You're the one who claimed dishonesty. Anthony DiPierro 21:22, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete: irrelevant, idiosyncratic. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:11, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete, add blurb about this to some page on Art techiniques Oberiko 12:50, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
      • I agree AY 05:25, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Still doubting on these two; lightly tempted towards keep. However, we certainly do not need both pages. If they are not going to be deleted, merge the two. Andre Engels 13:09, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • I like having lots of articles about new ideas, terms, movements. This is great. If "arfe" is a minor movement or technique now, no problem. I don't like having lots of personal articles about people, since they are ime harder to keep NPOV. Keep Arfé (ideally with links to instances of it), leave FRR as a note on that page... +sj+ 06:03, 2004 Feb 25 (UTC)
      • ideas, terms, and movements are fine, but there's no verification that this one actually exists. Anthony DiPierro 20:31, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep. Meelar 01:23, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete -- Graham :) 08:05, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)