Talk:Arenig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earth sciences Portal
Arenig is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, now in the public domain.

[edit] Move to Floian?

  • In Wikipedia:Requested_moves, User:Abyssal leviathin suggested moving this page to Floian: "This geological stage has been officially renamed by the international scientific body responsible for such matters. A section detailing the meaning of the original name and the reason for the renaming will be included when the article move is completed.Abyssal leviathin (talk) 13:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)"; but geologists have been calling this stage the Arenigian since the year dot, and This .pdf link says "into the sandstones of the middle Arenig/ late Floian (Early ... tween the early to middle Arenig/early to late Floian" as if the Floian period is part of the Arenigian period. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm not an expert, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but, it appears that you're absolutely right the Floian is "part," of the Arenig, or more accurately from what I can gather, it's a "truncated" version of the Arenig stage. The end of the traditional Arenig-age strata technically overlaps with other later stages instead of ending where it was originally believed to. This opens up a lot of doors that could allow confusion and murkiness in. It also seems that the Arenig as it was traditionally defined had no analogues outside of the UK, making the term of little use to the international scientific community. See here for my source on all that. Abyssal leviathin (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
      • As I understand it, the stages are, unfortunately, different, so different pages should be maintained. The International Committee for Stratigraphy has recently been taking advantage of improvements in radiometric dating, which have made it possible to formally define and date stages; this has led to the definition of new stages according to the most suitable boundaries, rather than the historical ones. This means that lots of new stages have been created; since their beginnings and ends are not the same as existing stages (because they are defined at different lcoations or times), the old stages are different, and redundant. No stages have simply been renamed (this would just sow unnecessary confusion!). This means that the "old" name still refers to a period of time, albeit one that isn't ratified (or strictly defined), and that scientists should avoid using where possible. Smith609 Talk 18:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)