User talk:Archanamiya/Archives/2007/April
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
Your false accusation of vandalism
In the punk subculture article you reverted my legitimate improvements to the article and falsely labelled them as vandalism. Please be more careful in the future. Spylab 15:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Clutter...
What clutter? ;-D
--oKtosiTe talk 14:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Composer?
Master composer? That's a little bold... You only did compose 3 decent size songs... I agree, however, that you are currently addicted to gamemaker. The gifty uprising councillor; AFYFAF 01:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
User Category for Discussion
Thanks
Thanks for reverting that. I thought I clicked undo for the vandalism... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Super Spy 0 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
- Heh, forgot to sign... --°° $ūp£® $pÝ 0 °° 00:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Glad I could help! :-) -Billy227 00:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Berghain
Think of a quick and good explanation for reverting and calling my edit vandalism. [1] —AldeBaer 00:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- I see, I must have hit the B above the edit box. May I tag the article appropriately now? —AldeBaer 00:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. I have nothing against it! Just be more careful next time :-) -Billy227 00:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Next time, stop and think before calling another user's edit vandalism. Remember: Stupid - accidents - happen.—AldeBaer 00:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Listen buddy. IT's NOT MY FAULT YOU SCREWED UP! NEXT TIME, PLEASE JUST KEEP EDITING RATHER THAN FILLING MY USERPAGE WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS!Thank you! -Billy227 00:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Calm down. I screwed up a tiny little bit, and you called my good-faithed edit vandalism instead of just removing the BOLD TEXT mistake. You screwed up more than me. —AldeBaer 00:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well then, I guess YOU have to be more careful, eh? -Billy227 00:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- You may want to actually follow these links: Hanlon's razor - Wp:vand#What_vandalism_is_not - WP:AGF. —AldeBaer 00:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have, thank you very much -Billy227 00:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Calm down. I screwed up a tiny little bit, and you called my good-faithed edit vandalism instead of just removing the BOLD TEXT mistake. You screwed up more than me. —AldeBaer 00:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Listen buddy. IT's NOT MY FAULT YOU SCREWED UP! NEXT TIME, PLEASE JUST KEEP EDITING RATHER THAN FILLING MY USERPAGE WITH YOUR COMPLAINTS!Thank you! -Billy227 00:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Next time, stop and think before calling another user's edit vandalism. Remember: Stupid - accidents - happen.—AldeBaer 00:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. I have nothing against it! Just be more careful next time :-) -Billy227 00:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Russell, Ontario
I just went on to the Russell, Ontario page yesterday and today, and I noticed vandalism all over the article. I cannot believe how much vandalism was on that page. They had things about a meow-meow-mohawk tribe, and a guy with a name I will not mention, and said that the council members were Igor Hinkinpuff or something like that, and Caroline Hards. You were the last person editing the page (I saw this on "history" page). Did you vandalize the articleRussell, Ontario? There was also another I.P. address that had been editing before you, so that person may have done it- 74.101.186.13
- No! I myself noted that yesterday and was considering reverting all the vandalism, but it proved to be to costly in terms of time. I think that article should be blanked, then started over again, because it's just too vandaliszed. -Billy227 20:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
600 Channels of Doom!/ An Oldie But a Goodie
Hi. I saw you reverted the redirect on 600 Channels of Doom!/ An Oldie But a Goodie as vandalism. I read through the AFD discussion identified in the talk page, and determined that there was no concensus to delete, but the article in ints current state is a sub-stub. If you check the list of episodes to which I redirected, you'll find that the list article actually contains more information about the episode than the episode article, thus the redirect. -- Whpq 16:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. Regrettably, I have declined your request as you do not have 500 mainspace edits. You are welcome to apply again at a later time. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp 16:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Billy227! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrbtalk 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
User:Billy227/Help
Hi Billy, please keep in mind that we did discuss this template ourselves (outside of WP) and it was my idea, so, if you don't mind, please give me some credit using the <noinclude> documentation on the template. Thanks! Tim.bounceback(talk | contribs | ubxen) 21:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing! Glad I can help! -Billy227 21:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)