Template talk:Archbishops of Canterbury
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Needed?
Somebody said that this might not really be needed. I thought about and I think it should go. What do you all think, esp. in light of the new Archbshop box? SECisek 01:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, I kinda like being able to see at a glance where one archbishop fits into the history. A succession box limits you to immediate neighbors; and a see also link taking you away to a big multi-page list is clumsy. Doops | talk 20:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Good enough. SECisek 21:14, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Is there a way it can default the template so it loads collapsed, at least until we fill out most of the articles? I would be bold but I don't know how to do this. Some of the stubs are crushed with this at the bottom of the page.
- I also updated for usage consensus for the time periods so we don't have to go through that all again. -- SECisek 22:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wrapping
Hmm, it seems that Rowan Williams is always ending up on his own line at the bottom of the template, after George Carey ·
. This is odd because there is plenty of room on that line for the text. I have changed font sizes and have tried in both IE and Firefox and cannot figure out why. Thx. — MrDolomite • Talk 00:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)