Talk:Arcelor Mittal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Companies Portal
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating assessment scale.
Business and economics Portal
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
High rated as High-importance on the assessment scale
Flag of Luxembourg Arcelor Mittal is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaboration intended to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg at the English language Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page..
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Move from "Arcelor-Mittal" to "Arcelor Mittal"

There is no "-" in the company name. See:

/ MartinHagberg 15:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I've now moved the page from Arcelor-Mittal to Arcelor Mittal. / MartinHagberg 15:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Move again?

When Arcelor Mittal launched their new brand identity, they started to write the company's name with CamelCase: ArcelorMittal. Should this article be moved to ArcelorMittal? MartinHagberg 12:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge Archelor and Mittal with ArchelorMittal

I think not - they are both equals, it's not as if one giant company absorbed a small one. So you can't easily pull two full histories into 1 article. 82.211.87.61 10:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Let Arcelor and Mittal Steel Company on its place with its history. --Jklamo 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Same here. If we do this we might as well merge all companies that merge.Nejee16 02:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Disagree with merger I also agree. There is a tendency to merge all companies together; Arcelor and Arcelor Mittal have different histories. The articles should be linked, not merged together.--Scotchorama 12:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Absolutely not, as per above comments. Choalbaton (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chairman

I'm moving the following 'note' from the article to the talk page: "Please note that Joseph Kinsch has been foreced to step down as chairman, in the right box: Key people Joseph Kinsch, Chairman is thus not any longer true, please adapt asap" KMS (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)