User talk:Arbol25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Arbol25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Urthogie 19:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] just saw your excellent update to Bisexual chic in the 2000s

and wondered if you might feel like trying to update Bisexual until graduation with similar info. It STILL seems hoplesly out of date to me (please see my comments on their discussion page) CyntWorkStuff 00:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh that's great, thanks so much CyntWorkStuff 01:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Changes in Changes in lesbian/bisexual until graduation article article

What you put in was basically what I was talking about. I had just updated it to get it THAT far, (go to 'history' and look at 'diff' going backwards to see my changes). Previously it was all about some 1993 article about women attending elite east-cost women's colleges who were (allegedly) just acting cool and were really going to settle down and be darling little straight girls when they graduated . . . even though their OWN data says that only one quarter stop identifying as LGBT sometime in the future . . . which I finally realized meant that 75% continue to identify with the community, (I'm not very good with math . . .can you tell?). Additionally it did NOT say that it was a pejorative term it said it was basically "humorous" . . . Sigh! CyntWorkStuff 02:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Donald Trump vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Donald Trump. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Although most of your editing seemed constructive, these edits were not. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 01:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

At best your contribution belongs in a trivia section or Donald Trump in the media if it was a publicity stunt. Rudia was clearly not one of his wives. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 16:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rudy Giuliani, you will be blocked from editing. The category you added is inappropriate for this article. -Tvoz |talk 05:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "cross dressing"

You are restoring a category that should not have been there in the first place. Don't be disingenuous - you know very well that Giuliani is not a cross dresser. He put on women's clothing for a few comedy performances because apparently someone thought that was funny - don't ask me why - but that does not make him transgender or a cross dresser and I suspect you know that. He's no more a cross dresser than Milton Berle or Dustin Hoffman. These are performances. If you didn't understand that before, I hope you get it now. This is viewed as vandalism, and vandalizing articles will lead to being blocked from editing. Tvoz |talk 06:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Because I don't find it funny to have to revert vandalism. You may find it funny, but it's just making work for others. By the way, contrary to what you said, Uncle Miltie was not in the Cross Dressing article, and I took Giuliani out, because it is ludicrous. As for blocking - I didn't say "ban" - I'm not threatening, I'm just letting you know what the consequences of vandalism are. So why don't you find some constructive editing to do. The project can always use some more. Tvoz |talk 06:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

You asked what < u > means on another editors page? Hope it's OK for me to answer as I noticed Joie de Vivre‎ hasn't been around for a few weeks. If you want to underline something just put the < u > before and after the word. Hope that helps. Take care INXS-Girl 16:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Good job INXS-Girl! I also responded on my Talk page with the same answer. Joie de Vivre T 17:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)