User talk:ArberBorici

[edit] Mirëdita

Tung Arbër , Unë jam një vajzë 23 vjeçare nga Ulqini , jam e re këtu në wikipedia dhe nuk e kuptoj shumë mirë anglishten ,prandaj shpresoj që mund të më ndihmosh për të mësuar se si mund të redaktoj këtu në wikipedia , faleminderit për ndihmën tuaj Lulieta (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Pershendetje Lulieta dhe mireseerdhe mes nesh (shqiptarëve ne Wikipedia)!

Neper faqen ne gjuhen angleze te Wikipedia-s (numri i te cilave eshte me i madhi deri tani), duhet ta zoterosh anglishten ne nje nivel jo me pak se mbi nivelin mesatar, sepse cdo artikull qe shkruhet, redaktohet, ndryshohet, etj., duhet te kete koherence dhe unitet ne lidhje me te pakten nivelin e gjuhes angleze. Sidoqofte, hidhi nje sy ketyre faqeve ndihmuese nga Wikipedia.

Nje sy te shpejte faqeve: Wikipedia:Introduction, Wikipedia:Manual of Style, Wikipedia:Tutorial, Help:Editing, and Wikipedia:Your first article

Faqe per editimin ne gjuhen angleze: Si të redaktosh një faqe

Nje tutorial i shpejte: Wikipedia:Tutorial, Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Per cdo paqartesi qe mund te linde me shkruaj :-). Eshte teper e rendesishme pjesemarrja e shqiptarëve ne faqet angleze te Wikipedias, ne menyre qe te shmangen te gjitha propagandat anti-shqiptare dhe ne menyre qe te vendosim FAKTET dhe te shmangim qendrimet e njeanshme. --_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 20:10, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Faleminderit për përgjigje të shpejtë :).Gjithsesi , unë edhe pse nuk e flas anglishten shumë mirë jam në një kurs të anglishtes dhe shpresoj që së shpejti do ta flas më mirë.Gjithashtu faliminderit për ndihmën tënde por a bën të më tregosh se si ta bëj "userpage" diqka të tillë si tënden , edhe një herë faliminderit shumë ,Goodbye :) Lulieta (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Patjeter :). Hape kete faqe: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ArberBorici&action=edit dhe kopjo te gjithe kodin e asaj faqe tek faqja jote: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lulieta&action=edit . Me tej, fshi nga faqja jote ato pjese te kodit qe nuk te perkasin ty :-). Me thuaj, --_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 20:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Faleminderit për ndihmën , gjeta një faqe këtu në wikipedia ku paska më shumë "userboxes" për t'i vendosur në userpage , edhe një herë faleminderit--Lulieta (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

hey ,
check out this new userbox I created , got the idea from a userbox I saw in your page so I decided to make a new one in english and with minor changes
Let me know what you think and feel free to modify it {{User from Illyria}}--Cradel 20:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, bukur. Ne vend te This user has Illyrian ancestry mund te perdorim edhe ndonje nga keto fraza: This user is of Illyrian ancestry. Ndersa per formatin, per ngjyrat, mund te gjejme ndonje helmete me te madhe, si ikone?--_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 07:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] That map

Megistis is right: We need to have a source for that map. It's likely a copyvio. Please clarify where you got it from. Note that lying about image uploads (like declaring an image "self-made" when you got it from somewhere else) is a very serious offense on Wikipedia and will get you blocked for a long while, next time you do it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean. Well, the website I got it from is [www.dardania-rv.de], a website where I participate frequently.--_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 12:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, deleted. Please check all your other image uploads too. Those population maps don't look very self-made either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding maps which I have modified, the phrase "self-made" appears by default. How can I change it to the original name of the author?--_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 12:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

If you've just modified them but not made them all by yourself, please don't use the upload form that says "self-made". Modifying doesn't mean you get the copyright, it still belongs to the original creators. For the map you uploaded previously, you can simply go and edit the image desciption page, like you would any other page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

CONFUSED! Aren't Wikipedia images distributable, modifiable under certain GNU licenses?--_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 12:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

If you base yours on an existing (legitimate) Wikipedia image, that is fine, you just put the same license on your version that the original one had, and link to the original as your source. Unfortunately, in the case of the Sandzak population map, the older upload seemed to be itself a copyvio, which is of course not your fault. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, now, I have modified the descriptions in the images I have uploaded. One of them is entirely my own work. Thanks!--_Arbër ^{Let's talk} 12:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral point of view

I agree that we should keep the neutral point of view, but why do you think that your point of view is neutral? Kosovo Albanian's independence has been recognized by only 20 countries. Kosovo isn't member of the United Nations, and government from Pristina does not control the Northern Kosovo, which is loyal to Serbian government from Belgrade.Until Kosovo's independence becomes fully recognized internationally (if that happens), I believe that we should write Serbia as the name of the country , and Kosovo as the name of province (or: country Serbia, claimed by Kosovo).--Andrija (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Two points. First, I didn't say my view was neutral, but I clearly said that yours was not, as it is required by Wikipedia. Second, Kosovo has declared independence from Serbia and is being recognized by 20+ countries. Therefore, whether we like it or not, it is, indeed, a country. Take a look at the Kosovo article to understand what I am talking about. :) In addition, if you say that a town belongs to Serbia, while its geographic position is in Kosovo, then you are violating the NPOV. --_Arbër ^{T • ?} 13:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Consenus breached, need support

Hello Arber, contrary to a reached consensus there is a splitting going on instead a merging: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kosovo#Split_completed And I would appreciate your assistance. Thank you! --Tubesship (talk) 05:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, my ultimate opinion is that Wikipedia has become too much biased. If you know from the beginning that somebody's intentions are negative toward the predefined set of goods and evils, then you shouldn't even lose a second of your life trying to let them know how wrong and irrational they are :).--_Arbër ^{T • ?} 10:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kosovo Article

Hi, I noticed that you are a member of the Kosovo project. I am busy over at the Kosovo project which merged (dubiously) with the one on the Republic of Kosovo. The aforementioned article hoever does not want to deal with RoK and we are stuck. would you be kind enough to come over and give some help. User Dab and user Beam have hijacked the article and want to write about the region of Kosovo and not about RoK. That is they want to dedicate a small section to it. Here is the link, thanks you. Jawohl (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kosovo#Disputed_Territory

Ok, I'll be of assistance in order to maintain a neutral, but factually correct, point of view. --_Arbër ^{T • ?} 06:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but that will be difficult, since the existence of an article on RoK is already seen as POV although even Republika Srpksa has its own article. I do not even have to bother mentioning other countries with disputed sovereignty. Do you think we should start to create an article on RoK instead, since the one on Kosovo is classified as an geography article from what I see. Jawohl (talk) 09:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I see. Well, when we talk of, say, Canada, we talk about Canada's geography and Canada as a sovereign country. Therefore, when we talk about Kosovo, we should talk about the Geography of Kosovo and the Republic of Kosovo. Consequently, as for me, RoK should be a separate article. --_Arbër ^{T • ?} 10:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I know it is to much asked but please just go through the disputed territory and the following proposed intro thread to have a clear opinion as to what is going on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kosovo#Disputed_Territory . There is a article on geography of kosovo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Kosovo but the guys over at the Kosovo article claim that they are writing on the region of kosovo which is different then the RoK. While the data that they use for that region is same as the one which should be for the RoK. It is a clear PoV pushing, by trying to minimize the existence and significance of RoK and pretending that this Kosovo article is something else. It is ridiculous and I do not know how to bring it to an end since I started here quite late. One thing is clear. RoK deserves a NPOV article and the Kosovo on is clearly not about RoK. Claiming that RoK article would be POV is pure crap since RoK is a undeniable reality, with all the problems that it has. Thank you again. Maybe you might also try to get some additional people to help and solve this issue. Jawohl (talk) 11:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Albanian painters

Hi there. This is SPECTRE calling NATO -just kidding.

Could you please help translate this sometime (I'm currently working on the List of Albanian painters:

Artur Tashko lindi në Korçë më 10 prill 1901, në familjen e shquar të Thanas Tashkos dhe Heleni Zografit. Emri i tij i vërtetë ishte Anastas, por në art përdorte emrin Artur Tashko. Ai ishte fëmija i dytë i familjes ku pjesëtarë të tjerë ishin Gjergji (Gaqo), Kostandini(Koco), Katerina, Aleksandri(Leko) dhe Tefta Tashko.

Prindërit e Arturit rridhnin nga një dinasti e shquar për angazhimin e saj në çështjet e atdheut në ditë të vështira. Në vitin 1904 ata emigruan në Aleksandri, Egjypt ku jetuan deri në vitin 1912 derisa u kthyen në Shqipëri. Arturi erdhi në Shqipëri në vitin 1907 dhe qëndroi për rreth një vit. Në vitin 1908 ai u largua përgjithmonë nga Shqipëria. Arturi vazhdoi studimet në Bejrut, Liban dhe më pas fiton një bursë studimi në 1920 nga Qeveria Shqiptare për në Austri. Në Vjenë ai studioi në Akademinë e Arteve të Bukura dhe njëkohësisht filloi karrierën artistike. Aty u ndikua nga artistët e Secceessionit Vjenez dhe u njoh me krijimtarinë e Renoir e Cezanne. Në 1923 i ftuar nga vëllai Kostandini që ishte diplomat në Ambasadën Shqiptare në SHBA, transferohet atje dhe vendoset në Boston ku studion drejtësi në Universitetin e Harvardit. Por krahas karrieres si jurist ai studioi edhe Arte të Bukura në Muzeun e Bostonit. Dhe e thelloi kulturen e tij artistike me studime për flaut në Konservatorin e Bostonit, duke e ndare kete pasion me motren e tij Tefta Tashko Koço. Martohet me gruan e parë, Elsa, aktore ne teatrin Shekspirian te Boston-it. U lindi një djalë në vitin 1939 të cilit i vinë emrin Artur.

Në 1939 fillon udhëtime në Evropë, Francë, Gjermani, Itali, Austri dhe aty u ndikua nga rryma kubiste, duke braktisur impresionizmin. Njihet me piktorë të mëdhenj të kohës si Picasso, Leger, Delaunay, Jean Arp, me te cilet morri pjese ne Ekspoziten e Vienes. Më pas u njoh me artistë si Pollock, Kooning, Rothko të cilët i përkisnin ekspresionizmit abstrakt. Mbas Luftës së Dytë Botërore, u njoh ne Spanje dhe u martua me pianisten Roza TashkoMe 1962 vendoset në Bogota, Kolumbi ku jetoi për gati 31 vjet. Vdiq në Bogota ne vitin 1994, në moshë 93 vjeçare, duke lënë pas një aktivitet të madh artistik dhe vepra të shumta , por siç shprehet e shoqja Roza Tashko “duke qënë modest për imazhin e tij një cilësi thelbësore e karakterit të tij, një virtyt i rrallë për kohët e sotme”.

Thanks ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 11:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm extremely busy, but I'll give it a shot some time this weekend. (I'm assuming you want me to translate that in English...)--_Arbër ^{T • ?} 11:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes -sure thanks. There doesn't seem to be an online Albanian translation package. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 11:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion on the use of Prishtina or Pristina

There is a straw poll over here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:International_reaction_to_the_2008_Kosovo_declaration_of_independence/City_naming#Pristina please join us. Jawohl (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Illyria

Hi, I noticed you created Wikipedia:WikiProject Illyria but it seems to have died off. Unless I'm missing something, I'd thinking about listing it for deletion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Whatever...--_Arbër ^{T • ?} 08:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] An Invite to join WikiProject Genetics

You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics. Addbot (talk) 15:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fighting Skopjan/FYROMian propaganda

Hello, I would like to know who I have to contact in order to have all FYROMian propaganda removed from Wikipedia. I thought this was a serious encyclopedia, however it is fullfulled with Skopjan crap. There are so many lies in here that you cannot even get a single line of light in this place.

The most horrendous things I have seen here being used that do not correspond to reality are: - Republic of Macedonian being used instead of the legally international name FYROM. - Ethnic Macedonian... everyone knows they are Bulgarians... what are they trying to pull. - In no place it says that it was Tito in 1948 the one who brainwashed this population and made them believe they were Macedonians as an intent to have a unified Yugoslavia and remove Bulgarian population from there. - There is missing information about the slogan "Macedonia is Greek, don't call them by my name!". --87.219.84.239 (talk) 03:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. First off, I strongly believe that Wikipedia is a special project. The fact that this encyclopedia is almost entirely open to edits by identified and anonymous users makes this project prone to vandalism, manipulation of academic and/or universally accepted sources, mixed soup of different levels of intelligence, and so on and so forth. Therefore, I comprehend your concern - it is derived from what I just wrote. Nonetheless, it is everybody's responsibility to ensure that each article meets encyclopedia standards, academic standards, Wikipedia standards, and a mixture of all three. That is, you have to use strong, logical arguments, accentuated by facts, in order to ensure the viability of both the project and the individual articles which you feel like you could mostly contribute to. I am open to further suggestions in order to ensure that articles such as the one about Macedonia remain neutral and respect the Wikipedia Neutral Point of View guidelines.--_Arbër ^{T • ?} 12:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)