Talk:Arbitral tribunal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
My recommendation is to move the section "Hearing" and "Procedure" over to the Arbitration page, and create the same for International Arbitration and any other arbitration pages that may come into existence since the manner of conducting proceedings and deciding evidentiary issues varies so widely, and descriptions of these variations would be a useful reference. McIlwrath 09:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'd suggest copying rather than moving, but other than that the proposal seems sound to me. --Legis (talk - [[Special:Contributions/Legisa word used in construction with and preceding certain forms of other verbs, as infinitives or participles, to express distinctions of tense, aspect, mood, etc.,
contributions]]) 14:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Description
This article has the absolute crappiest explanation of a Arbitral tribunal! Give a fucking idea you lazy assholes! Person who doesn't like the article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghadden (talk • contribs) 23:37, 21 February 2007.
