Talk:Arbitrage pricing theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Removed non-working external link.
[edit] request for clarification
This is a very nice article, but I'm confused by the sentence that starts "If APT holds, ...". It sounds like an assumption of APT is that risky assests satisfy the equation Is this an assumption or a consequence of the theory? For example, does this linear relationship follow from an another assumption such as lognormality of returns or is it a fundamental assumption?
Thanks.
- where
- E(rj) is the risky asset's expected return,
- RPk is the risk premium of the factor,
- rf is the risk-free rate,
- Fk is the macroeconomic factor,
- bjk is the sensitivity of the asset to factor k, also called factor loading,
- and εj is the risky asset's idiosyncratic random shock with mean zero.
-
- This doesn't make sense. why does rj's equation include E(rj)? --165.230.46.142 19:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)