Talk:Aquilegia canadensis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aquilegia canadensis is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Aquilegia canadensis is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

Circeus - The latest edit on this page (4/13/06) is an update of a link you originally posted. That original link was a commercial link. Please explain why you are permitted to post a commercial link for Columbine but remove my commercial link for Collared aracari. - Piapoco

  1. If you have things to say to me, please leave them at my talk page. I very nearly missed this. Searching my edit history for questionable edits (and I don't fear stating that any wikipedian with 10 000+ edits will have more than a handful) borders on Wikipedia:Stalking, please be aware of this.
  2. I originally intended to come back and edit this page with extra content, and left the link as quick references to myself. It is now obvious to me that not only is the link inapropriate for being a highly commecial one (I wasn't very aware of the external links guideline at the time I started this article) but also because it provides very little content. It should be gone by the time you read this.
  3. Despite this, I did have a second look at the Collared Aracari, and I see my revert was a bit hasty and the link is legitimate. Although you might want to make sure not to make such edits as minor edits in the future. Inappropriate minor edits are easy to mistake as inappropriate edits altogether that one attempts to mask with the "minor" label.
I hope you can have a nice contributing to wikipedia. Circeus 18:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)