Talk:ApologetiX
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
ApologetiX is part of WikiProject Pittsburgh, which is building a comprehensive guide to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.
Editors are currently needed to tag Pittsburgh-related articles with {{pghproj}}. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the Christian music WikiProject, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Christian music. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
"Smooth Grandmama is considered to be their most well-known parody." Been there for a while without citation. Probably not verifiable, so has been moved here for discussion or discard. "While maintaining the integrity of fundamentalist "grannies," the song pokes fun at its certain aspects." Cute, but unnecessary and has a faint whiff of NPOV. EasilyAmused 07:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
The bit about apologetics meaning "defense of the Christian faith" should be changed.
- Why? Sign your posts, please. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 00:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Apologitics DOES mean defence of the Christian faith. Askbros 09:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not the original poster, but isn't it defence of ANY position? That's certainly what wikipedia claims A Geek Tragedy 17:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- It can be, but in this case we're using the early definition of being related to the defence of the Christian faith. Askbros 22:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not the original poster, but isn't it defence of ANY position? That's certainly what wikipedia claims A Geek Tragedy 17:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ApologetixLogo.png
Image:ApologetixLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. 'DefenSe is spelled with an "S" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.76.103.97 (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I admit that I'm not a lawyer and am totally unknowledgeable, but all their logo is is a trinity symbol. Surely since the church has been using for such a long time, Apologetix can't have copyrighted it. And, I can't find the little c in a a circle next to it anywhere on they're website. Hope this maybe helps a bit.Sir Akroy 00:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Triquetra.jpg
Image:Triquetra.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
