User talk:AP1929

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ante Pavelić, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ante Pavelić was changed by AP1929 (u) (t) deleting 10531 characters on 2008-02-02T05:50:15+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Editing

Hi. You may wish to note that it is unnecessary, and indeed inappropriate, to sign off edits within an article. Also when you contribute on talk (discussion) pages, you can indent as appropriate by putting a colon(:) or colons at the start of each paragraph. It just makes it easier to distinguish one contribution from another.I've done this to some of your contributions. Regards Kirker (talk) 03:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. AniMate 20:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ante Pavelić has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 19:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ante Pavelić

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Ante Pavelić appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. SWik78 (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your Recent Edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ante Pavelic, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you feel you have received this warning in error, please conact me here. Thanks and Happy Editing, Dustitalk 19:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Do you really want to be blocked because of your edits how great guy has been holy Ante ? In last 3 days I have blocked 3 editors. If you want to be next there is no problem but I am afraid that somebody will block you before me.--Rjecina (talk) 08:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Administrators understand my english. If you do not understand then your english is bad.
If you want you can really write nice article because banned user Velebit has writen many chetniks shits in articles Ustaše, Ante Starčević, Ante Pavelić, NDH but you need to be more neutral. You need to accept Ustaše crimes but I am afraid that this will not happen. --Rjecina (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rasovi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rasovi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1129191. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Last Warning

After next insult you will be blocked. --Rjecina (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I am making mistake but you are right editor for discussion on talk page of article Srbosjek. I am really tired of that discussion and you will understand why !--Rjecina (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi! Can you translate?

Hey! Can you translate the article Teorija drugog najboljeg rješenja from Serbian to English? I would be very grateful to you if you'll do it. Kubek15 (Sign!) (Contribs) (UBX) 13:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] POV-pushing: warning

You have persistently pushed for an extremist point of view in relation to Ante Pavelic and related topics, involving persistent, longterm sterile revert warring against the consensus of other editors. ([1], [2], [3] etc.)

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. In your case, this would mean a topic ban from all Pavelic- and NDH-related pages. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Topic-banned

I've seen enough of your behaviour. You are here with the sole purpose of whitewashing a fascist regime, whose ideologies you openly subscribe to; you are doing this by means of sterile revert-warring, persistent editing against consensus and soapboxing on talkpages. This is disrupting our project and not conductive to the goal of writing a neutral encyclopedia. You are therefore now banned from all pages related to the Ustasa, Ante Pavelic and the Independent State of Croatia, for a period of six months. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)