User talk:Antiyonder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

While I don't agree with Strotha's attitude towards unregistered users, calling him/her a loser is out of line. Antiyonder 20:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry you had to be harassed by someone who is currently stalking me. He's blocked indefinitely, but keeps finding ways to make new accounts.--Strothra (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Antiyonder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Strothra (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Detective Chimp

Check the discussions on the WikiProject Comics talk page. An appearance in other media is not considered an alternate version. Doczilla (talk) 09:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, a comic based on a comic probably isn't another medium (I've been dealing with hundreds of these lately), but it's hard to call that an alternate version. It's the same character. Like I said in my original edit summary, it's just an appearance. We don't have to describe every appearance by every character. And as we've been discussing at the WikiProject Comics talk page, we also do not have to describe every alternate version either. They're rarely meaningful parts of a character's encyclopedia-worthy history. Doczilla (talk) 11:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh, gosh, no. Anybody is welcome to contribute. Please help discuss these things. It's not a simple issue, and we need a LOT of input to help figure out some guidelines on these things. Doczilla (talk) 11:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, neat! The Nerd has a new video out. Thanks for updating. :P --Kizor (talk) 04:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Roger Rabbit

At a glance, I see that there's not much of an introduction, there's no organization to the article (e.g., section headings), italics are missing, it belongs in more categories, and there's no real information about its importance or impact on anything else. Doczilla (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

No, I didn't say it should be a category. I said it belongs in more categories. Doczilla (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JLU comics

Sorry, I think I overreacted when I first saw the merger. While I still can't say I am in total agreement with you, I think it was best to merge the article so it does not get deleted. Again, sorry, I won't try to change it again. 76.189.125.215 (talk) 02:17, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: JLA/Avengers

She seemed to be sort of losing it while she was in the DCU, and I vaguely remember Kurt Busiek suggesting that maybe the DCU is why she snapped in Disassembled in a panel, but I can't provide proof of the second one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.20.207 (talk) 03:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)