User talk:Anti-establishment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!



Sam Spade 21:19, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dons away colours

I see you changed the away strip colours. Strangely enough, I thought it was red too, but when I dug out the May 5 issue of MK Citizen to get the precise colour red, they were in Midnight Blue! So just to prove I'm not mad, I searched the Citizen web site and the first picure I found was this - Red shirts and WHITE shorts and socks! So I am mad! It always used to be red - indeed there was a while when they only ever won when wearing red instead of that horrible State penitentiary blue and yellow.

So I had another search for the exact words and, sure enough, here they are in midnight blue. So you tell me??? --Concrete Cowboy 19:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Away colours

Before the start of the season and the name change when they were still wimbledon it was the dark blue, but on their website now there is no trace of a blue strip, just white and red.

[edit] Irish Defence Forces

Please do not replace valid links on the Irish Defence Forces page --ClemMcGann 21:35, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Their hardly valid if they dont work.

I assure you that many of us do use the site and its board, http://www.irishmilitaryonline.com/board/ furthermore your IRA site in not appropriate --ClemMcGann 22:03, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Aye yer ma

[edit] Trócaire

I've reverted your link removal on the above page; it was originally added to ensure balance - Pete C 22:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] VfD: Real Rap Fans

Hi;

I see you're pretty new around here, so I'd like to welcome you, but to also point out that it is against policy (and considered extremely rude) to erase other editor's votes and comments on an article's "Votes for Deletion" page. I understand if you feel bad that an article you create is being considered for deletion, but one of the main "points" of Wikipedia is that nobody "owns" an article, and sometimes that means that articles get erased. Besides, you're not really doing anything but "hiding" the votes; because of the GFDL the edit history has to be kept, so anyone can see what was on the page by clicking the history button at the top of the page. Hope you stick around and enjoy yourself. Soundguy99 12:48, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Amerie2.jpg

Image deletion warning The image Image:Amerie2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.


Hello! Following the policy on WP:PUI, I had to list that image you uploaded to the possibly unfree image list of today. I am sorry if this was mistakenly, and if it is, please forgive me and remember to add the right tag to the image itself, so that no one makes this same mistake again.

Thanks!

-Poli 03:34, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Amerie1.jpg

Image deletion warning The image :Image:Amerie1.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

[edit] Derry and County Londonderry

We have a compromise on these names (see Talk:Derry - please do not make things more complicated in the categorisation [1] --Henrygb 09:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nationalist forum.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Nationalist forum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

[edit] Image source/licensing for Image:Bobby sands mural in belfast320.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:Bobby sands mural in belfast320.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Escober600ie.jpg

Hi,

You noted at Escober600ie.jpg that you created the image. Could you add the appropriate license tag? GFDL-self is probably what you're looking for. Tempshill 18:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

You might be interested in Wikipedia:Leftist Parties and Movements Collaboration of the Week. --Revolución (talk) 05:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Nice, i'll check it out. Anti-establishment 20:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Template: User Socialist

Comrade: I've reverted your edit to Template: User Socialist. Please discuss changes to templates on the talk page before making any highly-visible changes that affect a dozen or so userpages. If nothing else, your choice of a blue link on a red background is unreadable to a sizeable proportion of the male population, myself included! Cheers! ➨ REDVERS 17:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Template:User Ulster Unionist

Hi. Please do not vandalise templates that you do not use. Thanks. --Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 19:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Civility / NPA warning

Hi. Your remarks on User:Mistress Selina Kyle's talk page violate wikipedia's no personal attacks. You are reminded to remain civil in your discussions with other editors. Failure to adhere to civility can lead to you being blocked. If you have a dispute over the above template, you should discuss it on Template talk:User Ulster Unionist. --Syrthiss 20:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


(edit conflict) Firstly [[User:Mistress Selina Kyle is claiming that you made a personal attack on her user page. To be honest it's such a weired insult that i'm not sure if you intended it as such. WTF does sand in the vigina mean? Secondly, moving your user page and user talk page like this breaks the "you have new messages" link when you get a message. It also breaks user contributions, making your user page not look like a user page. Yet your contributions still go under your old name. I suggest moving it back and just putting you new name as a nickname in your preferences. Or creating a new account with this new name. This prevents someone impersonating you by creating that account before you. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 20:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)