User talk:Anthony Ivanoff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Thanks for the Z80 work!

Hi and thanks for the contribution of the info on the Soviet Z80 clone! No problem about the language fixing; we all learn from each other that way. I know I do. Wikipedia is a prime way of polishing one's writing in any language, including one's own. :) If you know anything more about the T34 chip and other Soviet/Russian chips, don't hesitate adding info to the 'pedia; it will be greatly appreciated, believe me. I linkified the T34 article in case anyone has any info to put there, now or later.

As for myself, I take great interest in the history of computing in general, and microcomputing in particular, and also have an interest in Soviet high tech in many areas---from weapons to computing, etc, etc. (I guess I have the geek/engineer's gene; any tech stuff is interesting; an being a reader of history as well, I love to learn about tech that hasn't been very well covered in the Western press before the iron curtain went away). In time I hope to learn some more about the Soviet supercomputers.

By the way, is the T34 CPU's name in any way connected to/inspired by the 'real' T34? (a quality product by any standard, I'd say!) :-) Just wondering. --Wernher 00:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

No, but I was also amused by this coincidence when I first saw this chip. BTW, I live 0.5km from the place where these T-34s were produced during WWII :)
That's very interesting to hear. Are there some museum there now? And: weren't the T-34s manufactured more places than one? Also, I've heard/read somewhere that one reason that many T-34 crews were expert tank drivers/operators was the common practice of letting the factory builders who built each particular tank follow it into combat as its crew? --Wernher 00:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
There's a museum, but the most interesting is that on June, 1st they allow everybody to walk in any part of the plant and make an exhibition of tractors (the most interesting probably is T-800, which was, and maybe still is the most powerful tractor in the world). In 2003, when they celebrated their 70th anniversary, they had their exhibition not in the plant but almost in the center of the city, on one of the squares. Much more tractors were exhibited, include old ones and their newest ones, and besides, some tanks.
As for the places of manufacturing. I investigated this and it turned out that in fact, T-34 was produced in many places: Kharkov, Nizhny Tagil, and Gorky. Nowadays they don't produce any tanks here, but in Nizhny Tagil instead.
As for the crew, I haven't heard of this. This could hardly be true, I think, as at least at our plant they experienced a great shortage of workers, as most men went to war, so they had to employ women and children. My granny worked there when she was 14 years old. However, she told me only that during the peace, when they tested their tanks near our city, she did have to be there in order to fix any problems (as she worked in quality control department). BTW, this (producing & testing of tanks during the peace) was all kept in secret, she signed an NDA and wasn't allowed to go abroad until 1987. --Anthony Ivanoff 14:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
I will try to search for T34 microprocessor on the internet, but I don't think I will find much. Instead, I consider adding some info to the wiki about home-made Z80-based computers, amazingly popular in Soviet Union in 80s. I have two such computers, if I find some info about T34, I will take a photo of T34-based computer which is buried somewhere in the corner of my room and upload it here. I also have a great many Radio magazines (Radio, published since 1924, is still the most popular magazine in Russia about electronics) - and it was there where schemes and instructions for assembling these computers were printed. --Anthony Ivanoff 05:40, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
So, actually, the Russian electronics hobbyist community of the 80s seems to have functioned a whole lot like the American one, namely by having magazines publish circuit layouts and articles about microcomputer kits? I don't think we had such sophisticated magazines in Scandinavia; don't know about central and western Europe, though. --Wernher 00:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
That's right. It was this magazine who made all these Spectrums so popular, by publishing detailed descriptions on how to assemble them. IIRC, it all started from Radio80-RK computer ("Radio" for the name of the magazine, 80 for 1980, and RK for "Radio amateur's computer" - it was intended for calculations related to eletronics, thus helping these amateurs in their hobby). --Anthony Ivanoff 14:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Update: So I didn't find any info about T34BM1, as I expected. The only thing I found is this page. It is a poll, asking 'What was your first computer', and here a person says he had a T34-based computer (search for "Z80" in the page).

[edit] USSR home-made Z80 machines

And I also took photos of my two computers, and uploaded them. Maybe they could be used in some articles.

Cool. Might one or both of these machines by any chance be similar to any of those mentioned in the humongous list of ZX Spectrum clones? I must say I'm quite overwhelmed by the sheer number of Speccy clones made all across Europe incl. the USSR and Russia. This surely must be the most-cloned home computer ever. --Wernher 00:48, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
The computer on the first photo wasn't on the list, so I updated this list and wrote an article about it.
As for the other, unfortunately I don't know any information about it. Its manual only says that it's "a Leningrad variant of ZX Spectrum", and nothing more. --Anthony Ivanoff 14:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pointers

Thank you for the pointers on the use of stubs. As a novice I greatly appreciate the help I get. Celcius 07:49, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] This week's computer and video games improvement drive

You showed support for this week's computer and video games Improvement Drive.
This week World of Warcraft was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Havok (T/C) 11:34, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bob Roop

I started a Bob Roop article, and as you had commented on the discussion page of the deleted previous article, I thought you might be interested in contributing. Any help would be welcome. KillerChihuahua?!?

[edit] Oy vey -- you're mistaken

Hello Anthony: You have made a mistake in nominating Oy vey for deletion. See my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oy vey, and please read what I have added to the article Oy vey itself. I suggest you withdraw the nomnation for deletion on the grounds that you were not aware that it is a legitimate word in Hebrew and Yiddish and that the expression Oy is used in more than twenty verses all over the Hebrew Bible, besides the fact that it has become a hugely popular English word and expression, especially in the modern United States. Thanks for your attention. IZAK 17:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

* Indeed I have made a mistake. But anyway, most people voted for Keep, so let's just leave it as it is. Then, is it possible to withdraw the nomination even if it was me who nominated it? --Anthony Ivanoff 20:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] External/Internal links.

Please don't give articles internal links to non-article pages. This creates a problem for mirror sites that copy only the article name space. If somebody clicked on the mirror version of a link to the "Wikipedia:" project namespace, they'd get a 404 file not found error or something like that. Keeping the external link would be best, so they can be directed to the WP page if they want to see it. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 12:01, Dec. 19, 2005

[edit] Portal:Russia

Hello, Anthony. You should know that you are welcome to announce and discuss your output on Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. These are the places where Russian editors get together. Also, check your e-mail. --Ghirla | talk 13:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alex Bakharev

You are entitled to vote as you wish of course. However, did you base your vote based not on the candidate's strength and weaknesses or based on an advertizement from a third party that you didn't like? In the latter case, I would encourage you to study the candidate's contributions, statements and opposition. You are allowed to change your vote (as well as to keep it unchanged obviously) if you realize that you simply got carried away. Whatever you do, it is up to you of course. --Irpen 23:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks. WikiThanks.

I would like to express my thanks to all the good people who spent their valuable time time and effort working on my (failed) RfA voting. I understand your feeling and support them. abakharev abakharev 13:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Wikimedia Commons

Just wondering if you'd thought about moving your Spectrum-related photographs to the Wikimedia Commons? That way, they could be used for all versions of Wikipedia (e.g. Russian). Cheers! --StuartBrady 22:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Project

Hi, my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating th best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project.

The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it.

Wikipedia:Votes_for_best_User_page

Best regards, Federico Pistono ✆ ✍ 14:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Voskresenie

Hi Anthony, I've created this history/philosophy stub and I wondered if you'd be so kind as to take a look because I can't speak Russian. Researching this subject without any knowledge of Russian has proven to be a little too difficult. I'd like to find out as much info as possible, but I'm particularly interested to know when the group began and when it disbanded (if it has been disbanded?). I'd really appreciate your assistance!--Nicholas 15:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Well, according to http://www.marecki.ru/text/interesting_text_4.htm , it began in December 1917. In March 1918 there were already 18 people. They published a journal called "Free voices", free as in "freedom", of course. But there were only two issues, the last in June 1918. The name "Voskresenie" (resurrection), that is, resurrection of Russia, was adopted in late 1919. Bakhtin was the first to be arrested on December 8, and Meyer - on December 11, 1928, others a bit later - in December and January. So that was when it was disbanded.

But note that Voskresenie, in fact, should be a disambiguation page. Voskresenie in Russian can also mean:

    • Sunday
    • Resurrection (either related to Jesus Christ, or used metaphorically)
    • A very old (1970s till now), famous and popular rock band in Russia.

Thanks for your interest in Russia :)

PS Hmm... This page at marecki.ru may be a good source for turning the stub into a great article... Maybe I will translate info from there and put it in the article. Or maybe not =)

--Anthony Ivanoff 17:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for this Anthony. The most recent edit suggests that the Voskresenie were strictly opposed to the Bolsheviks. However, my understanding is that the group was sympathetic towards the revolution, although they wanted the freedom to express their spiritual beliefs. I'll do what I can to research this, but I'd really appreciate all the help I can get. Once again, many thanks Image:WikiThanks.png --Nicholas 18:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
In this [1] article, in the paragraph about Free Voices that they published, it is said:
The journal reflected the political ideas of the circle. The articles called Russian people to fight bolshevism and urged intelligentsia to unite for saving the Motherland. They warned people that they country is in danger. The believed that the main aim of Russian intelligentsia was to return to religion and fight together against bolshevism.
But a bit later, the author states:
The people in the circle did not have a definite political orientation. There were 2 communists, 1 monarchist, and most of them hoped for evolution of Soviet regime. The only way to save Russia, as they believed, was propaganda and rebirth of religion."
So it's in some way controversial :) --Anthony Ivanoff 18:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please always provide a reason for deletion of a article

I have noticed you used the {{db}} tag to delete Mationsbuds, please use a deletion template and always provide a reason for deleting a article, keep up the good work.(Rohit Singh 16:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC))

  • I think the article should be deleted because:
  • it's a vanity page, created by user with the same name as the article
  • article is about a non-notable subject
  • it is not clear what it is about and reads like an advertisement --Anthony Ivanoff 16:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

and sure, I will provide the reason next time

[edit] Depression

Thanks for your kind note. I am not currently depressed at the moment, but its a condition that I have been siffering from (like panic disorder) over the past year. I am nearly over it now, and thanks for your concern, I mainly added the userbox to show my solidarity with other sufferers of the disease. (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 06:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

Your change to the page Calibri was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ipa-N

you may be interested in

Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_26#Category:Writing_systems_categories

Tobias Conradi (Talk) 02:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Iskra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iskra.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted image

The Image:Stalin Lenin Kalinin.jpg was the duplicate of a featured Image:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg. Conscious 13:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rational

Hi Anthony. I've added fair use rational on some of your pictures to ensure they won't get deleted in future. Please add fair use rational whenever you uploaded any images under fair use.Keep the good working ;-) nahid talk 14-01-2007

[edit] Chelyabinsk Metro

Thanks for starting it off, please consider joining WP:SOVMETRO. --Kuban Cossack 14:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Trehgorny gerb.png

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Trehgorny gerb.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Translation

Dear Anthony,

Do you know of anybody ( maybe yourself!) who would be interested in translating an article which I wrote for Wilipedia ( see the URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Medium ). I will be prepared to pay for the translation.

Le dea-ghuí With good wishes

Éamonn Ó Gribín

11 Ardáin an Bhreathnaigh Iúr Cinn Trá ( Newry) Co. an Dúin ( Co. Down) Ulaidh ( Ulster) Éire ( Ireland) BT35 8DH Email: eogribin@iol.ie Eog1916 09:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Since you created the Gaston Waringhien article, you might be interested

The category Esperantists was deleted recently, and the deletion is up for review. In case you'd like to chime in, go here. --Orange Mike 18:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kwrite block selection.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kwrite block selection.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Missing image Image:2TE10U Russian Locomotive.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:2TE10U Russian Locomotive.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:2TE10U Russian Locomotive.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:2TE10U Russian Locomotive.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] looking for a people

Hi Anton, I am Jovica erom Bosnia by some mistake I received certain mail and I want to find one girl from Tchebarkul, Martovskaya street she's named Irina 26 years, she has sister Alina and brother Anton I am receiving mails from her but she doesn't realise or understand my mail and I think she could be in trouble thank you for any help My mail is joeaspirin.x@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.241.156.141 (talk) 21:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Russian_Mafia.23Notable_members

I've reported your reversion of the egregious BLP violation at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Russian_Mafia.23Notable_members. Corvus cornixtalk 23:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Otto_Lacis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Otto_Lacis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your note

Hi Anthony, sorry — that was a mistake on my part — I meant to remove the entire entry, not just the airline link. Crum375 (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)