User talk:Anthony Deighton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Qliktech

Qliktech has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this company was not notable enough for an article. Please review WP:CORP for the relevant concerns. If you believe the subject meets these criteria, please edit the article to make that more clear.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 14:45, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] QlikTech article meets inclusion critieria

QlikTech has been mentioned independently in a number of press reports. Notably:

  • "Plotting a BI Strategy," Biz Intelligence Pipeline, October 14, 2004
  • "Measuring Up," Intelligent Enterprise, October 30, 2004
  • "QlikTech Gets $12.5M," The Deal, December 7, 2004
  • "Liquid Software," BusinessWeek, May 27, 2005
  • "Payback Time," CIO Decisions, May 1, 2005
  • "Smaller Businesses Try Analytics," InformationWeek, May 9, 2005
  • "The Right BI Tool Can Lower ERP License Fees," Manufacturing Business Technology, June 1, 2005
  • "IT Self-service Gets a Boost," Computerworld, July 11, 2005
  • "QlikView’s Design Allows Flexibility," DM Review, July 15, 2005
  • "BI Megatrends – What's Accelerating BI Innovation?" Intelligent Enterprise, September 1, 2005
  • "Inventory Management: Better Decisions With Business Intelligence," Industry Week, September 29, 2005
  • "Wall to Wall Information," Managing Automation, October 27, 2005
  • "Processes—Not Applications—Make the Company Go Round," Manufacturing Business Technology, November 1, 2005
  • "Flu Dashboards Help Manage Drug Orders," BI Pipeline, November 4, 2005
  • "QlikTech Targets iSeries Base with Business Intelligence App," IT Jungle, November 29, 2005
  • "QlikTech Desktop to Offer Billion-Record Analysis Power," Intelligent Enterprise, November 1, 2005

[edit] RfD

On 27-Feb, you tagged the redirects Qlikech & Qliktech for deletion, but you did not list them at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. I have added them to that page for discussion. You may wish to add a comment there if you still wish to see these redirects deleted. In the future, if you nominate a redirect for deletion, please list it. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. -- JLaTondre 02:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict of interest

Since you are the VP Marketing of QlikTech, there is a conflict of interest with your editing the article on QlikTech. You probably weren't aware of it, but editing of articles on companies by their employees is strongly discouraged and frowned upon. I added a note on the Conflict of interest noticeboard.

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article QlikTech, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Chrisahn (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)