Talk:Anticon.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Hip hop, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to hip hop culture and hip hop music. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contents |
[edit] Redid some stuff...
I just made a fairly sizeable edit, although in actuality, it was really just a ton of small (slightly nitpicky) edits. Basically, I:
- Rearranged, reworded, rewrote, and expanded stuff
- Redid intro section, almost rewrote whole thing
- Updated and expanded projects section
- I updated the "current roster"
- Took out artists who haven't released stuff in a long time (not really "active" anymore then)
- Added a few artists who've recently become "active" by releasing new material, and added new artist (sole and the skyrider band)
- Updated "See also" section
- Added Abstract Hip Hop link, put it on top (since it links back to anticon, and also links to several other labels similar to anticon, like Def Jux and Rhymesayers)
- Added link on Indie rock, since some of the material anticon has put out recently is indie rock
Hopefully nobody protests these changes too much. If you disagree with something I did, please don't revert the whole edit; change the individual thing yourself.Shnakepup 06:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Significant interview with all original founding members reinstated (Feb, 2008) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.169.33 (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Closely associated?
In the list of artists that "are or have been closely associated with anticon", it lists Mike Patton. What has he done with anticon.? I was interested to hear it and did a bit of searching and couldn't find anything. This would surely imply he wasn't "closely associated".Febodyed 13:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- It would seem i didn't look that hard. still, the album that doseone and jel are on isn't out yet (if i'm right) and i'd still say he wasn't closely associatedFebodyed 15:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Mike Patton appeared on Odd Nosdam's Burner. That alone probably doesn't constitute "close association", but it's something. — TheJames 14:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
What about Dosh? He is with Anticon as much as the others... how do you define that list?
[edit] Alias & Ehren
Should Alias & Ehren be in the list? --Anthony5429 14:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
I made an article for Alias, and also did an album article for Lillian. Hopefully that is good enough...Alias did more a collaboration with Ehren. It's not like they're a group or anything, like Themselves. Otherwise, "Themselves" would just be called "Dose one & Jel".Shnakepup 16:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- I concure. Group or just a collaboration, Alias & Tarsier deserve some attention as well. LetterGo 03:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Logo.anticon.jpg
Image:Logo.anticon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Logo.anticon.jpg
Image:Logo.anticon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ANTICON SUCKS
Especially Clouddead and Deep Puddle Dynamics. Can't believe I subjected my ears to such garbage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.49.65 (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
